Review: Denon DCD-600NE CD player

 (image from the Denon website)

I still remember the first time I heard a CD player - this was at some teenage party back in the mid-1980s and I was rather impressed how loud it played.  Hey this was before I knew what being an audiophile was.  It was a year later when my dad bought a Magnavox player for his system.  I spent a mighty chunk of change - $22 - buying a Misfits compilation that, sadly, ended up sounding very bright, thin, and irritating to the point where a headache soon came on.  Later, in college, when I got into tube gear, I owned a Theta Basic DAC.   However I still thought my Thorens TD-166 turntable with a $20 Grado Black cartridge served the soul of music much better.

Years later there was a time that I was into digital.  By then vinyl was getting harder to get a hold of and the CD re-issues were pumping out some excellent compilations of rarer groups.  I started experimenting with several DIY modifications and designs.  For example, the transformer-coupled RAKK DAC was one of the better iterations of digital I have ever heard.  But in the end it was analog that won my heart.  Over the years my CD collection continued to shrink while my passion for vinyl increased and became the focal point of my system.

Time marched on - CDs are now ridiculously cheap.  From a purely music lovers point-of-view, they are an easy way to build a music collection, especially compared to the now high price of vinyl.  I decided once again to buy a CD player, hoping that technology has improved the Red Book standard.

But what to get?  I searched through Ebay and Audiogon, looking at several vintage models.  Ideally I wanted something with a digital out so I could experiment with DACs in the future.  Accessories 4 Less came to the rescue with a refurbished Denon DCD-600NE player that featured a 32 bit DAC and AL32 processing that - to quote their website - "expands audio data to 32 bits and uses a proprietary algorithm to interpolate the data and perform up-conversion and sampling, achieving a playback sound that is close to the original source."  So, as my friend likes to joke, "Perfect Sound Forever just got MORE perfect."

The Denon DCD-600NE is a stripped down player and - shockingly - has a metal enclosure.  If you want to use the full functions - random play, direct mode, track programming, etc, - this is where the rather large remote comes into play.  Digital out is via Optical - not ideal - but this may point to a future Schiit Bifrost 2 DAC upgrade.

So how does this little beast sound?  Initial impressions weren't the best.  There was a forwardness to the sound that was tiring, along with a sense that, compared to even my lowly Dual CS5000 turntable, that 20% of the musical information was just missing.  What I mean are the spatial cues were gone, rendering the voice and instruments as very two-dimensional.  A good reproduction system should have depth along with breadth, transporting the listener to the mind of the producer, or with some classical recordings, to the venue itself.  Instead the Denon reminded me once again why I prefer vinyl for home listening.

After a few days of break-in I decided it was time for some comparisons against two different turntables along with some general impressions.

The forwardness was reduced but there is no other way to say this - this budget Denon still sounds like digital.  Compared to the same LP, the CD is missing reverb cues; either the room or artificial.  An example of this is Willie Nelson's Stardust.  The body of the acoustic guitar is gone, leaving just the top layer of the guitar notes.  The "black background" sounds uncanny but not in a good way.  It's like a black hole of information - nothing is there! - compared to the warmth and fullness of analog which captures the space of the room and the size of the instruments.  It feels as if the music has gone through some kind of horrible clinical ward, stripping off the flesh of the music and leaving only the bones.

Now that does sound like a harsh review.  To be fair some CDs were better than others, like a few Chet Baker albums in my collection that sounded quite good.  Jazz is usually well-recorded but I still preferred my LP versions - even with my second turntable, a budget Dual CS5000.  At least with analog my brain connects to the music and I can relax.  With digital I am still gritting my teeth and feel uncomfortable with the overall presentation.

Maybe a DAC will bring some improvements.  We shall see!

System:

• Audio Research SP8
• modified Eico ST70 with 6AR6 tubes
• Cardas Neutral Reference interconnects
• KEF R500 speakers
• Dual CS5000 turntable with an Ortofon OM20 cart, aftermarket Shibata Stylus
• Thorens TD309 with Ortofon 2M Bronze
  

Review: A Tale of Two Schiits - Mani 1 vs Mani 2 phono preamp

(photo from Schiit)

I've been using the original Schiit Mani 1 phono preamplifier for some time.  Its sole purpose has been to provide the needed amplification and equalization for my second turntable, the Dual CS5000.  It has done well plugged into the line section of the Audio Research SP8, which has a phono section that is used for the primary turntable, a Thorens TD309.

To be fair, the Mani is a budget phono stage so I could put up with the slight graininess, mid-fi resolution, and the general lower fidelity.  For all the Mani 1's faults, it is still better than a lot of stock phono sections found in budget receivers, preamps, and integrateds.  And given the mostly background music it was used for I had no complaints.

A recent visit to the Schiit Audio site and I saw that a second version of the Mani has been released, this one using a different op-amp and it was also direct-coupled.  The case looks exactly the same but the dip switches on the bottom have changed, allowing more settings for MM and MC cartridges.

To cut to the chase, compared to the old version, the new Mani 2 is more detailed, faster, has better resolution, deeper bass, and higher overall fidelity.  It also images, left-to-right in a fashion that will be most pleasing.  It isn't perfect - nothing is! - but it does swing at a higher than the $149 (black face model) price point suggests.

Where the Mani 2 ultimately fails - compared to the Audio Research SP8 or the Classe Five - is inner detail and that certain "you are there" magic that I've heard with these more expensive units.  The soundstage of the former is also flatter without that depth I've come to expect.   However, to be fair. the Mani 2 does strike awfully close to better preamps making my budget Dual CS5000 sound a lot closer to the combination of Thorens TD309 and the ARC SP8 phono stage.  Depending on your front end, amps, and speakers, this difference may not matter at all.

 As always your mileage may vary depending on your front end, setup, and preferred listening habits.

System:

• Dual CS5000 with Ortofon OM20 and an aftermarket Shibata stylus
• Thorens TD309 with Ortofon 2M Bronze
• Audio Research SP8 with vintage Mullard 12AX7s 
• Eico ST70 "Frankenstein" amplifier with 6AR6 output tubes
• KEF R500 speakers
• MIT interconnects
• Cardas Twinlink speaker cables
  

Short Review: Dynaco A-25 VW loudspeakers

 

The Dynaco A-25 is a 2-way bass-reflex loaded speaker sporting a 10" woofer and a soft dome tweeter.  I picked up this pair at a half-off day estate sale.  I wasn't, however, expecting much since my experience with vintage speakers has been mixed.

To my surprise, the A-25s really capture the midrange in a nice and pleasing manner.  Yes my (larger) KEF R500s can pump out more bass & treble, do dynamics better, and throw a deeper soundstage; but still these old Dynacos have a certain magic that is hard for me to put my finger on.  Perhaps it is the nice all tubed front end I have, but these vintage speakers are just relaxing to listen to.  They do jazz really, really well; hard rock not as nicely due to their dynamic limitations.

So if you see a pair of A-25s for a good price, check them out.  They would be great in a small system with a low-powered tube or Class A solid-state amp; along with a suitable preamplifier.  They don't do all of the hi-fi tricks of something more exotic, but, like the Dynaco PAS and Stereo 70, capture the midrange depth and bloom a lot better than many, many modern budget components.

Turntable Basics and Buyers Guide

 Here is a short video I made about buying turntables; geared toward beginners or anyone looking to upgrade to a new record player.

Review: a Frankenstein Eico ST-70 tube amplifier

 I bought this strange modified amplifier on Ebay. It looks as if someone took a stock integrated and modified it to be a basic power amp. Gone is the normal set of controls on the front plate, replaced with a generic black panel and power indicator light.

 

A peek on top of the grille - what is inside?

Of course you know - you read the title of this post! Someone took an Eico ST-70, removed the preamplifier portion and converted it to use 5881s instead of the stock 7591s.

Since I didn't have any 5881s on hand, I modified this amplifier to use the military 6AR6. Since the 6AR6 has a completely different pinout (and bias points!) it took an entire rewire of the output stage, along with more negative bias than the stock circuit.

I also changed the power supply with new electrolytic capacitors for the main bucket, 6SN7 phase-splitters, and 12AX7 input tube. I also added a little 1.5H Dynaco choke to reduce the B+ ripple. After a little troubleshooting, and bias modifications, I finally got this amp to work; with 40mA per output tube. 

So how does this pentode output Frankenstein weird output tube sound? Even with old Russian 6N8S tubes, surprisingly good. Bass extension - with the large output transformers - is really deep. And there is the old tube midrange and smooth treble thing happening. Maybe it's been too long with an SS (Aleph J clone) amplifier, but this little push-pull tube amp is quite magical.

Chet Baker Sings, for example, really is holographic - for a mono recording - with his voice and trumpet sounding natural and forward. Compared to the Aleph J solid-state amplifier, music is more relaxed but, at the same time, more dynamic. The tube amplifier sounds way more powerful than its approximate 30 or 35Ws per channel.

I'm surprised that the KEF R500s work so well with this vintage Frankenstein; you never really know what you are going to get with modern speakers.

Once I get over the excitement of having a new amplifier, I plug in some old Zenith 6SN7s that I have on hand. Maybe things will get even better-better.