Showing posts with label replacement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label replacement. Show all posts

Friday, February 26, 2021

Review: a Frankenstein Eico ST-70 tube amplifier

 I bought this strange modified amplifier on Ebay. It looks as if someone took a stock integrated and modified it to be a basic power amp. Gone is the normal set of controls on the front plate, replaced with a generic black panel and power indicator light.


[​IMG] 
A peek on top of the grille - what is inside?

[​IMG]

Of course you know - you read the title of this post! Someone took an Eico ST-70, removed the preamplifier portion and converted it to use 5881s instead of the stock 7591s.

[​IMG]

Since I didn't have any 5881s on hand, I modified this amplifier to use the military 6AR6. Since the 6AR6 has a completely different pinout (and bias points!) it took an entire rewire of the output stage, along with more negative bias than the stock circuit.

[​IMG]

I also changed the power supply with new electrolytic capacitors for the main bucket, 6SN7 phase-splitters, and 12AX7 input tube. I also added a little 1.5H Dynaco choke to reduce the B+ ripple. After a little troubleshooting, and bias modifications, I finally got this amp to work; with 40mA per output tube. 

So how does this pentode output Frankenstein weird output tube sound? Even with old Russian 6N8S tubes, surprisingly good. Bass extension - with the large output transformers - is really deep. And there is the old tube midrange and smooth treble thing happening. Maybe it's been too long with an SS (Aleph J clone) amplifier, but this little push-pull tube amp is quite magical.

Chet Baker Sings, for example, really is holographic - for a mono recording - with his voice and trumpet sounding natural and forward. Compared to the Aleph J solid-state amplifier, music is more relaxed but, at the same time, more dynamic. The tube amplifier sounds way more powerful than its approximate 30 or 35Ws per channel.

I'm surprised that the KEF R500s work so well with this vintage Frankenstein; you never really know what you are going to get with modern speakers.

Once I get over the excitement of having a new amplifier, I plug in some old Zenith 6SN7s that I have on hand. Maybe things will get even better-better.

 

 

Monday, October 28, 2019

Short Take: BLISS Shibata Stylus for Ortofon Super OM Cartridges


The Ortofon Super OM 20 cartridge has been discontinued for some time now.  This is a shame, especially for owners of turntables with lightweight tonearms like my long-running Dual CS5000.  The Super OM 20 cartridge provided a warm but still lively sound and seemed to have a synergistic match with the Dual.  Given my last one was in need of replacement due to wear, I began researching a replacement cartridge or stylus.

There are a few makers of high compliance cartridges out there but I have ventured in that area without too much success, at least compared to the good sound I was getting with the OM 20.  With that in mind I decided to buy a replacement stylus.  I could have gone with the OM 30 or 40 replacement, but this aftermarket unit available at TurntableNeedles.com caught my eye.  The Shibata needle profile, in theory, will pull in more detail and have a better high-end response than the ol' nude elliptical of the OM 20.  It's also priced lower than the higher end OM models so I decided to give it a chance.

Given that the cartridge body is the same and the only difference is the stylus, needle, and cantilever what kind of changes did I expect?  Not too much.  The body of the music is the same, as is the fun liveliness nature of Super OM series.  But, compared to the OM 20, there is more fine detail and treble information.  A minor step up to be sure, but one that is the worth the small price difference between a stock OM 20 stylus and its aftermarket Shibata replacement.  Highly recommended.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

New Project: Heathkit W4-AM rebuild


I didn't even get a chance to buy another Heathkit W-2, when I saw this golden beauty on Ebay.  A few bids later and I won.  Now the Heathkit W4-AM isn't exactly their best product.  There have been several complaints about the quality of the output transformer, stability issues, and the "lower rent" build quality.  Personally I think it's a lovely little amplifier and worth the time for a good restore.

The first thing to do is to replace the power supply and coupling capacitors.  After that, I plan on doing the bricktop mod to increase stability and improve the quality of the square waves.  And of course I have to score another one so I can listen to stereo.  But even with one amplifier running, I like what I'm hearing out of a completely stock unit.  I also dig the use of all octal tubes and wonder how some Gold Lion KT66 reissues would sound in there - the 4A filament supply should be able to handle the extra load.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

The Most Important Amplifier In the World: The Dynaco 70



 
The Dynaco 70 is the most important tube amplifier ever made.  Sure, some may quibble at that characterization, but I can’t think of any other amplifier – at least within North America – that has turned on more audiophiles to the possibilities of tube amplification.  Like countless others, it was the amplifier that turned me on to an alternative way of listening to music. 

Back in the late 1950s, the stereo wars were heating up.  Many audiophiles had invested in the expensive monoblocks or stereo amplifiers from Marantz, McIntosh, and Fisher.  The smaller players – Heath, Dynaco, EICO, and Pilot were nipping on the heels of their more upscale brethren.   David Hafler made the right move at the right time by introducing a $99 stereo wonder – the Dynaco 70.

Sure, this little budget amplifier couldn’t compete with the big boys at a performance level, but it was such a bargain that no one seemed to mind.  The sales numbers certainly back this up.  Yes, the power transformer was woefully underrated for supplying the current to four EL34s, and yes, the 7199 tube is not an ideal driver/phase-splitter, but whatever failings the Dynaco 70 has is ameliorated by the warm forgiving sound that throws a big wide soundstage.  This is an amplifier made for playing music, and if paired with good tubes, the performance is damn well good enough to have made me a tube convert for life.

I bought my first Dynaco 70 at the tender age of nineteen.  I was heading off to college and needed a stereo system.  At the time I didn’t know anything about tube amplifiers but came enamored with them after hearing a McIntosh 240 over at a friend’s house.  I loved the black transformer and chrome chassis look and lusted after the glowing tubes.  When he asked if I wanted a tube amp, I readily agreed.  However, I will admit that I had to hide my disappointment when he brought out the brown caged Dynaco 70.  It certainly couldn’t compare to the McIntosh in the looks department.  But little did I know how this little tube amplifier would change my life.

The amplifier started stock with Siemens EL34s, a Mullard 5AR4, and RCA 7199s.  After a few weeks of that, the same friend suggested running an outboard tubed regulator to supply the front end.  With the shortage of 7199 tubes – this was before the Internet, mind you – I converted the PCB, through the use of a RCA manual and my first soldering iron, to use 6GH8As.  After that, it was modified to run the EL34s in triode.  After that, it was sadly sold to another friend who began his own audio journey with tubes.  At that point I was running modified Scott or EICO integrated amps, a small step before my DIY journey.
A few years ago, I exchanged emails with the fellow who bought the Dynaco 70.  He still had it!  We did a swap and I had my very first amplifier back in my possession.  The original circuit board was long gone, the tube sockets were shot, and the can cap had been replaced by a giant oil power supply capacitor.  This old amplifier was due for a rebuild.

In order to stay true with the spirit of the Dynaco house sound, my restoration was fairly limited in scope.  The input circuitry was replaced with a PCB from Triode Electronics that utilizes a pair of EF86 tubes and a single 12AU7.  The power supply can-cap was replaced with a SDS circuit board that fitted underneath one of the output transformers.  A bit of wire and solder, some new output tube sockets, and the amplifier was ready to sing again.  

For tube selection, I went with some budget Russian valves – EH EL34s, Sovtek EF86s and a 5AR4.  The sole American tube was a late production Phillips 12AU7.  The sound, as to be expected, was a little on the harsh side.  This was due to the “solid-state in a bottle sound” that afflicts many of the lower-end Russian tubes.  So it was time for a spate of rolling.  In the end, the amplifier finished with Matsushita EL34s, Dutch EF86s, a Hitachi 5AR4, and a 1950s-era RCA blackplate 12AU7.  This change made for a much smoother and cohesive amplifier that was quite enjoyable to listen to.

But, I’m not the sort of chap who wears rose-colored glasses.  The Dynaco, even with an improved power supply and new input circuit, suffers from several flaws that stop it from being a truly great amplifier.  
First of all, the power transformer is helpless underrated in the current department which will cause the voltage to sag at higher output powers.  Another issue is the use of a single 5AR4 rectifier to handle all four output tubes.  Sure, it’s within the specification of that tube, but still it is hitting the top of the envelope.  Of course these two problems can be rectified (ha! – editor) by an aftermarket power transformer and a different rectifier or even the use of solid-state diodes (which have their own issues).

However, even with those changes, I believe the fatal flaw of the Dynaco 70 rests with the A-470 output transformers.  Like many things Dynaco – especially on their budget gear – this output transformer was built to a price point.  At higher output levels, the amplifier sounds like the core is saturating, giving that pleasant “tube-like” compression.  It sounds like the images are on springs, causing the soundstage to shrink in size as large dynamic swings occur.  Why do I pin the blame on the output transformers?  I’ve heard the same effect on the Dynaco Mark IV, the monoblock version of the Dynaco 70 that have a much beefier supply that isn’t shared between two channels.

So yes, the Dynaco 70 – and all the new kit versions now available – is still a great introduction to the world of tubes, but it isn’t the end game.  There are much better - and admittedly more expensive – amplifiers that really lift the veil over the music and provide the sort of output that an audiophile wants to hear.